enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Miller)_v_Secretary_of...

    R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [1] is a United Kingdom constitutional law case decided by the United Kingdom Supreme Court on 24 January 2017, which ruled that the British Government (the executive) might not initiate withdrawal from the European Union by formal notification to the Council of the European Union ...

  3. R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Miller)_v_The_Prime...

    The case was only the second case heard by eleven justices in the Supreme Court's history; the first was R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (2017), which delivered an 8–3 verdict that the royal prerogative could not be used to invoke Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union.

  4. The Crown - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crown

    The titles of these cases now follow the pattern of R (on the application of [X]) v [Y], notated as R ([X]) v [Y], for short. Thus, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is R (on the application of Miller and other) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, where "Miller" is Gina Miller, a citizen.

  5. R v Miller - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Miller

    R v Miller (case citation: [1982] UKHL 6; [1983] 2 AC 161) is an English criminal law case demonstrating how actus reus can be interpreted to be not only an act, but a failure to act. Facts [ edit ]

  6. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overseas_Tankship_(UK)_Ltd...

    Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co or Wagon Mound (No. 2), [1] is a landmark tort case, concerning the test for breach of duty of care in negligence. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council held that loss will be recoverable where the extent of possible harm is so great that a reasonable man would guard against it (even if the chance of the loss occurring was very small).

  7. Mica Miller Case: Here's Everything We Know About - AOL

    www.aol.com/everything-know-mica-miller-case...

    Here’s what to know about the case. What happened to Mica Miller? On April 27, Mica was seen in footage leaving her home in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina at 11:38 a.m. ET. Mica then went to Dick ...

  8. United States v. Miller - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Miller

    United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (National Firearms Act); Adams v. Williams (1972); (dissenting opinion of Douglas, joined by Marshall) The leading case is United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174, upholding a federal law making criminal the shipment in interstate commerce of a sawed-off shotgun. The law was upheld, there being no evidence ...

  9. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union [1995] UKHL 3 is a House of Lords case concerning the awarding of compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. The case is considered significant in constitutional terms for its ruling on the extent of ministerial prerogative powers.