Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A lasting impact of this work has been awareness of the underlying drivers of the high false positive rate in clinical medicine and biomedical research, and efforts by journals and scientists to mitigate them. Ioannidis restated these drivers in 2016 as being: [16] Solo, siloed investigator limited to small sample sizes
John P. A. Ioannidis (/ ˌ iː ə ˈ n iː d ɪ s / EE-ə-NEE-diss; Greek: Ιωάννης Ιωαννίδης, pronounced [i.oˈanis i.oaˈniðis]; born August 21, 1965) is a Greek-American physician-scientist, writer and Stanford University professor who has made contributions to evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, and clinical research.
You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
The papers introducing the ranking have been quoted extensively by authors working in Bibliometrics and Scientometrics.For example, reference [3] describing an update to the methodology of this index number is cited [12] from authors publishing in journals such as SAGE's Research on Social Work Practice, [10] Elsevier's Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, [13] Springer's Forensic Science ...
John Ioannidis argues that "claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias." [46] He lists the following factors as those that make a paper with a positive result more likely to enter the literature and suppress negative-result papers: The studies conducted in a field have small sample sizes.
[1] [2] It is headed by John Ioannidis and Steven Goodman. [3] Laura and John Arnold Foundation provided the initial founding of the center, [1] which launched in 2014. [3] [4] [5] Ioannidis' past work that led to the creation of METRICS has been covered twice in The New York Times. [6] [7]
In 2005, John Ioannidis published a paper titled "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False", which argued that a majority of papers in the medical field produce conclusions that are wrong. [6] The paper went on to become the most downloaded paper in the Public Library of Science [ 9 ] [ 10 ] and is considered foundational to the field of ...
In February 2014, Hatixhe Latifi-Pupovci, a professor from the University of Prishtina, submitted a flawed paper to Medical Archives, a journal published in Bosnia and Herzegovina. On 14 April 2014, she received a reminder to pay the publication fee of 250 EUR, which she never did. The paper was already published in the journal four days earlier.