Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A simple interpretation of the KL divergence of P from Q is the expected excess surprise from using Q as a model instead of P when the actual distribution is P. While it is a measure of how different two distributions are and is thus a "distance" in some sense, it is not actually a metric, which is the
where is the Kullback–Leibler divergence, and is the outer product distribution which assigns probability () to each (,).. Notice, as per property of the Kullback–Leibler divergence, that (;) is equal to zero precisely when the joint distribution coincides with the product of the marginals, i.e. when and are independent (and hence observing tells you nothing about ).
The total variation distance (or half the norm) arises as the optimal transportation cost, when the cost function is (,) =, that is, ‖ ‖ = (,) = {(): =, =} = [], where the expectation is taken with respect to the probability measure on the space where (,) lives, and the infimum is taken over all such with marginals and , respectively.
The only divergence for probabilities over a finite alphabet that is both an f-divergence and a Bregman divergence is the Kullback–Leibler divergence. [8] The squared Euclidean divergence is a Bregman divergence (corresponding to the function x 2 {\displaystyle x^{2}} ) but not an f -divergence.
Here, [] is the kernel embedding of the proposed density and is an entropy-like quantity (e.g. Entropy, KL divergence, Bregman divergence). The distribution which solves this optimization may be interpreted as a compromise between fitting the empirical kernel means of the samples well, while still allocating a substantial portion of the ...
In probability theory, particularly information theory, the conditional mutual information [1] [2] is, in its most basic form, the expected value of the mutual information of two random variables given the value of a third.
The mutual information of two multivariate normal distribution is a special case of the Kullback–Leibler divergence in which is the full dimensional multivariate distribution and is the product of the and dimensional marginal distributions and , such that + =.
The relatively high value of entropy () = (1 is the optimal value) suggests that the root node is highly impure and the constituents of the input at the root node would look like the leftmost figure in the above Entropy Diagram. However, such a set of data is good for learning the attributes of the mutations used to split the node.