Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The lead plaintiff, Joan St. Julian, claims that State Farm violated the law by failing to pay sales tax to drivers when reimbursing them for the "actual cash value" of their cars that were deemed total losses. [69] According to the lawsuit, State Farm systematically underpaid claims made by thousands of consumers who experienced total vehicle ...
And so they’ve launched two class-action suits, one in Florida and the other in Georgia, claiming State Farm uniformly rejects repair estimates that exceed $4,700 per claim — when the market ...
State Farm has lodged a case in the U.S. Supreme Court, 'State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. Rigsby, to be heard in the term which commences in October 2016. State Farm is arguing that the attorneys for the Rigsbys violated a part of the False Claims Act, that is they released documents which were under the 60 day seal rule.
State Farm provided a breakdown of the top 10 states leading the nation in catalytic converter claims: California, with over 2,000 claims compared to 5,400 claims in 2023 Illinois, with 540 claims ...
According to Then, State Farm told him to take the car to one of their certified repair shops, so he did. The shop he used, Gerber Collision and Glass, took months to repair it, and according to ...
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company is an insurance company. [3] Prior to 2005, State Farm offered two types [fn 1] of insurance policies to homeowners: flood insurance, which would be reimbursed by the federal government's National Flood Insurance Program, and general homeowner insurance, which would be paid directly by State Farm. [3]
Insurance companies like Progressive, State Farm and Allstate now offer these usage-based programs that track things like your speed, braking habits and miles driven through a small device that ...
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 463 U.S. 29 (1983), commonly known in U.S. administrative law as State Farm, is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning regulations requiring passive restraints in cars.