Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
"Separation of church and state" is a metaphor paraphrased from Thomas Jefferson and used by others in discussions of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof".
In the mid-20th century, the rhetoric of separation was revived and ultimately constitutionalized by anti-Catholic elites, such as...Protestants and other Americans United for the Separation of Church and State...who feared the influence and wealth of the Catholic Church and perceived parochial education as a threat to public schools and ...
The “wall of separation” between church and state is frequently cited as why people of faith – again, Christians in particular – should keep their faith to themselves when it comes to ...
In Spain, commentators have posited that the form of church-state separation enacted in France in 1905 and found in the Spanish Constitution of 1931 are of a "hostile" variety, noting that the hostility of the state toward the church was a cause of the breakdown of democracy and the onset of the Spanish Civil War.
Jefferson emphasized the First Amendment built “a wall of separation between church and state.” In these days of instant news and Tik Tok sound bites, optics are everything and everywhere.
The importance of these efforts is demonstrated by the quote in his Memorial in Washington D.C. from the person most identified with “separation of church and state,” Thomas Jefferson: “God ...
The phrase "separation of church and state" became a definitive part of Establishment Clause jurisprudence in Everson v. Board of Education (1947), a case that dealt with a state law that allowed government funds for transportation to religious schools.
Jefferson sought what he called a "wall of separation between Church and State", which he believed was a principle expressed by the First Amendment. Jefferson's phrase has been cited several times by the Supreme Court in its interpretation of the Establishment Clause, including in cases such as Reynolds v. United States (1878), Everson v.