enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Defamation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

    Defamation is a communication that injures a third party's reputation and causes a legally redressable injury. The precise legal definition of defamation varies from country to country. It is not necessarily restricted to making assertions that are falsifiable, and can extend to concepts that are more abstract than reputation – like dignity ...

  3. False statement of fact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_statement_of_fact

    The legal rule itself – how to apply this exception – is complicated, as it is often dependent on who said the statement and which actor it was directed towards. [6] The analysis is thus different if the government or a public figure is the target of the false statement (where the speech may get more protection) than a private individual who is being attacked over a matter of their private ...

  4. English defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_defamation_law

    A defamatory statement is presumed to be false, unless the defendant can prove its truth. English defamation law puts the burden of proof on the defendant, and does not require the plaintiff to prove falsehood. For that reason, it has been considered an impediment to free speech in much of the developed world.

  5. United States defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

    Truth is an absolute defense against defamation in the United States, [1] meaning true statements cannot be defamatory. [ 2 ] Most states recognize that some categories of false statements are considered to be defamatory per se , such that people making a defamation claim for these statements do not need to prove that the statement caused them ...

  6. United States free speech exceptions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech...

    On entry across borders, the government may bar non-citizens from the United States based on their speech, even if that speech would have been protected if said by a citizen. [84] Speech rules as to deportation, on the other hand, are unclear. [85] Lower courts are divided on the question, while the leading cases on the subject are from the Red ...

  7. Actual malice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actual_malice

    The Supreme Court adopted the actual malice standard in its landmark 1964 ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, [2] in which the Warren Court held that: . The constitutional guarantees require, we think, a Federal rule that prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with ...

  8. Glossary of rhetorical terms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_rhetorical_terms

    Eulogy – a speech or writing in praise of a person, especially one who recently died or retired. Euphemism – an innocuous, inoffensive or circumlocutory term or phrase for something unpleasant or obscene—e.g., in advertising for female hygiene products any liquid shown is never red, it's usually blue.

  9. Counterman v. Colorado - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterman_v._Colorado

    Although the First Amendment protects free speech, there are exceptions for incitement, defamation, obscenity, fighting words, and true threats. [3] Before the Supreme Court ruling, there were conflicting standards in different states as well as in different federal courts of appeal over how to determine whether a threatening statement is not protected by the First Amendment.