Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Pork barrel, or simply pork, is a metaphor for the appropriation of government spending for localized projects secured solely or primarily to direct expenditures to a representative's district. The usage originated in American English , and it indicates a negotiated way of political particularism .
The bridge came to be known in the national media as the "Bridge to Nowhere," and is considered a quintessential example of pork barrel politics. On March 2, 2011, when H.R. 662: Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 [14] was up for debate there was a proposed motion to recommit the bill, argued for by Jared Polis, D-Colorado, in order ...
Earmarks have often been treated as being synonymous with "pork barrel" legislation. [28] Despite considerable overlap, [29] the two are not the same: what constitutes an earmark is an objective determination, while what is "pork-barrel" spending is subjective. [30] One legislator's "pork" is another's vital project. [31] [32]
Critics derided his efforts as pork barrel spending, [10] while Byrd argued that the many federal projects he worked to bring to West Virginia represented progress for the people of his state. Notably, Byrd strongly opposed Clinton's 1993 efforts to allow homosexuals to serve in the military and supported efforts to limit same-sex marriage . [ 11 ]
"Pork barrel spending" is a term in American politics used to refer to congressmen or senators who use their position on Committees in the Senate or House to appropriate federal money to their own district or state, and therefore bring increased business and investment to their home area. This process is referred to as "bringing home the pork."
An iron triangle relationship can result in regulatory capture, the passing of very narrow, pork-barrel policies that benefit a small segment of the population. The interests of the agency's constituency (the interest groups) are met, while the needs of consumers (which may be the general public) are passed over.
In terms of the people’s reception of benefits, universal distributive policies benefit wide ranges of people and the “unanimous inclusion of representatives’ projects in omnibus-type legislation produced by one committee.” [9] Universalism also points to the legislative support needed to pass these distributive measures and the ...
Lowi at the Cornell Club of Boston, May 2009. Theodore J. "Ted" Lowi (July 9, 1931 – February 17, 2017) [1] was an American political scientist. He was the John L. Senior Professor of American Institutions teaching in the Government Department at Cornell University.