Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
JUUL e-cigarette with a battery and differently flavored pods. Vaping presents safety risks that are definitionally higher than those of simple abstinence, as they have no independent health benefits. This comparison is relevant because some users adopt e-cigarettes for the nicotine (or cannabinoids), even though they have never smoked.
A new analysis from researchers at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health has uncovered a microbial toxin in Juul pods that has the potential to cause serious longterm lung damage.
The nicotine salts are said to create an experience more like smoking than other e-cigarettes on the market, [70] as Juul attempts to deliver a nicotine peak in five minutes, similar to a traditional cigarette. [71] The nicotine salts reduce the harshness of the Juul aerosol as compared to tobacco smoke. [72]
Although some evidence indicates that e-cigarettes are less addictive than smoking, with slower nicotine absorption rates, [13] [14] long-term e-cigarette safety remains uncertain. [15] [16] One issue is the need to separate the effects of vaping from the effects of smoking among users who both vape and smoke. [note 4] [17]
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
A college student is warning others about the dangers of smoking Juul pods after one of his lungs collapsed. ... where Chance said the pain kept getting worse over the course of five hours ...
Puffing characteristics differ between smoking and vaping. [68] Vaping typically require more 'suck' than cigarette smoking. [69] Factors that influence the level of blood nicotine concentrations include nicotine content in a device; how well the nicotine is vapored from the liquid reservoir; and additives that may contribute to nicotine intake ...
Juul became one of the highest-profile successes of the initial burst in e-cigarette use more than a decade ago. That success was beset by concerns that e-cigarettes were introducing a new ...