Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Lovitz said that though support from the federal government for underrepresented communities may not be as robust, local and state governments have begun stepping in to offer new initiatives and ...
A federal appeals court on Friday dealt the immigration program known as DACA a legal setback, keeping the program alive but teeing up a showdown at the Supreme Court. In a unanimous ruling, a ...
In June, President Joe Biden signed an executive order to allow undocumented residents married to U.S. citizens and who have lived in the country for at least 10 years to apply for legal residency.
On April 24, 2018, John D. Bates, a Senior United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, ruled that the Trump administration must resume accepting new applications for DACA but stayed his decision for 90 days to allow the Department of Homeland Security to explain why the program was being canceled.
After a federal ruling declared the program illegal in 2021, the Biden Administration promptly moved to keep the program intact. In 2022, the Department of Homeland Security made a new ruleto allow the codification of DACA under federal law, with the explicit purpose of strengthening its legality and securing stability for beneficiaries. [78]
DACA statuses can be terminated or not renewed based on the discretion of DHS, as it is not a law. DACA is a presidential executive authority, which also means that it can change based on future presidents. DACA, therefore, creates open space for undocumented students to qualify for post secondary education benefits. [27]
The program’s long-term legal status remains the subject of court challenges
Trump's action was widely protested across the country. Business leaders argued it was unfair and could harm the economy. [203] The cancellation of the program was put on hold by a court order, and the Supreme Court ruled in June 2020 that the Trump administration's decision to end DACA was arbitrary and violated the Administrative Procedure Act.