Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The "second-order cone" in SOCP arises from the constraints, which are equivalent to requiring the affine function (+, +) to lie in the second-order cone in +. [ 1 ] SOCPs can be solved by interior point methods [ 2 ] and in general, can be solved more efficiently than semidefinite programming (SDP) problems. [ 3 ]
Examples of include the positive orthant + = {:}, positive semidefinite matrices +, and the second-order cone {(,): ‖ ‖}. Often f {\displaystyle f\ } is a linear function, in which case the conic optimization problem reduces to a linear program , a semidefinite program , and a second order cone program , respectively.
In LP, the objective and constraint functions are all linear. Quadratic programming are the next-simplest. In QP, the constraints are all linear, but the objective may be a convex quadratic function. Second order cone programming are more general. Semidefinite programming are more general. Conic optimization are even more general - see figure ...
Such a constraint set is called a polyhedron or a polytope if it is bounded. Second-order cone programming (SOCP) is a convex program, and includes certain types of quadratic programs. Semidefinite programming (SDP) is a subfield of convex optimization where the underlying variables are semidefinite matrices. It is a generalization of linear ...
The IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimizer solves integer programming problems, very large [3] linear programming problems using either primal or dual variants of the simplex method or the barrier interior point method, convex and non-convex quadratic programming problems, and convex quadratically constrained problems (solved via second-order cone programming, or SOCP).
There are two main relaxations of QCQP: using semidefinite programming (SDP), and using the reformulation-linearization technique (RLT). For some classes of QCQP problems (precisely, QCQPs with zero diagonal elements in the data matrices), second-order cone programming (SOCP) and linear programming (LP) relaxations providing the same objective value as the SDP relaxation are available.
The advantage of the penalty method is that, once we have a penalized objective with no constraints, we can use any unconstrained optimization method to solve it. The disadvantage is that, as the penalty coefficient p grows, the unconstrained problem becomes ill-conditioned - the coefficients are very large, and this may cause numeric errors ...
The inverse first and second moments of the must be finite. A good choice for Δ n i {\displaystyle \Delta _{ni}} is the Rademacher distribution , i.e. Bernoulli +-1 with probability 0.5. Other choices are possible too, but note that the uniform and normal distributions cannot be used because they do not satisfy the finite inverse moment ...