Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Published as a supplement to the UN B-Tech Project's recent paper on generative AI, the “Taxonomy of Human Rights Risks Connected to Generative AI” explores 10 human rights that generative AI ...
AI systems uniquely add a third problem: that even given "correct" requirements, bug-free implementation, and initial good behavior, an AI system's dynamic learning capabilities may cause it to develop unintended behavior, even without unanticipated external scenarios.
Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter is the title of a letter published by the Future of Life Institute in March 2023. The letter calls "all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4", citing risks such as AI-generated propaganda, extreme automation of jobs, human obsolescence, and a society-wide loss of control. [1]
The statement is hosted on the website of the AI research and advocacy non-profit Center for AI Safety. It was released with an accompanying text which states that it is still difficult to speak up about extreme risks of AI and that the statement aims to overcome this obstacle. [1]
The models focus on the text inserted, so inaccurate information could mislead AI and provide poor results. Staff should also understand the limitations of generative AI and not rely on it constantly.
In May, Musk responded to a Breitbart article on X quoting Nobel Prize winner Geoffrey Hinton’s warnings about the dangers of AI. And he reiterated his warning about AI during the summit this week.
The letter highlights both the positive and negative effects of artificial intelligence. [7] According to Bloomberg Business, Professor Max Tegmark of MIT circulated the letter in order to find common ground between signatories who consider super intelligent AI a significant existential risk, and signatories such as Professor Oren Etzioni, who believe the AI field was being "impugned" by a one ...
AI developers are doing more with smaller models requiring less computing power, while the potential harms of more widely used AI products won’t trigger California’s proposed scrutiny.