enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argersinger v. Hamlin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argersinger_v._Hamlin

    Argersinger was sentenced under Florida law to 90 days in jail for carrying a concealed weapon but was never represented by counsel. Hamlin was the local sheriff. Argersinger claimed his conviction was unconstitutional, but his case was dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court, who relied on Duncan v.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 407

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Date decided The Bremen: 407 U.S. 1: 1972: Argersinger v. Hamlin: 407 U.S. 25: 1972: Fuentes v. Shevin: 407 U.S. 67: 1972: Colten v. Kentucky

  4. Assistance of Counsel Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assistance_of_Counsel_Clause

    As stated in Brewer v.Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977), the right to counsel "means at least that a person is entitled to the help of a lawyer at or after the time that judicial proceedings have been initiated against him, 'whether by way of formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment. ' " [2] Brewer goes on to conclude that once adversarial proceedings have begun ...

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Constitutional law of the United States; Overview; Articles; Amendments; History; Judicial review; Principles; Separation of powers; Individual rights; Rule of law

  6. Scott v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_v._Illinois

    A plurality held that Illinois had not violated the Constitution. Writing for four of the justices, Rehnquist clarified the Court's holding in Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972) and argued that states could sentence a convicted criminal to imprisonment only if that person had been represented by counsel. Since Scott was not sentenced to imprisonment ...

  7. "Rule Breaker Investing" Market Cap Game Show: Throwdowns ...

    www.aol.com/rule-breaker-investing-market-cap...

    On this episode of Rule Breaker Investing, two past "Market Cap Game Show" champions, Matt Argersinger and Yasser El-Shimy, face off in a battle of wits and estimates.With 10 stocks on the line ...

  8. In re Oliver - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Oliver

    In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 (1948), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the application of the right of due process in state court proceedings. The Sixth Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that criminal prosecutions require the defendant "... to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation...and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."

  9. A Game Changer for Gambling Stocks? - AOL

    www.aol.com/2013/02/27/a-game-changer-for...

    The following video is from Wednesday's Investor Beat, in which host Chris Hill and analysts Bryan Hinmon and Matt Argersinger dissect the hardest-hitting investing stories of the day. New Jersey ...