Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Examples of jurisdictional errors include ... a matter or making a decision or order of a kind which wholly or partly lies outside the theoretical limits of its ...
(a) the constitutionalisation of review for jurisdictional error; [Note 2] [Note 3] (b) the nature of jurisdictional error; [Note 4] (c) the consequences of jurisdictional error; [Note 5] and (d) the differences in this area of law between administrative bodies and courts. [Note 6]
The distinction between jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional errors of law and the effectiveness of ouster clauses against non-jurisdictional errors of law is exemplified by the cases of Re Application by Yee Yut Ee (1978), [34] and Stansfield Business International Pte. Ltd. v. Minister for Manpower (1999).
The High Court, in a unanimous decision, allowed Kirk's appeal. The Court held that the provisions in the Industrial Relations Act that restricted the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to review the commission's decision were constitutionally invalid.
Associate Justice Byron White, writing for the five-member majority, disagreed with the determination by the Court of Appeals that there was a "clear absence of all jurisdiction" for Judge Stump to consider Ora McFarlin's petition, noting that Indiana law gave circuit courts "original exclusive jurisdiction in all cases at law and in equity ...
By a 3–2 majority, the House of Lords decided that section 4(4) of the Foreign Compensation Act did not preclude a court from reviewing the tribunal's decision. It said that a court is always able to inquire whether there has actually been a "decision", meaning a legally valid decision.
Case history; Prior: On appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kentucky: Holding; Where a river is said to be the boundary between two states, the boundary properly extended to the low water mark of the opposite shore and no higher; plaintiff's motion of ejectment based on title granted by the state of Kentucky was denied.
In 1946, Congress amended the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and specifically abolished the writ of coram nobis in federal civil cases.Prior to enactment of these amendments, Congress reviewed all relief previously provided for civil cases through the writ of coram nobis and adopted those avenues of relief into the rules; therefore, eliminating the need for the writ in federal civil cases. [25]