Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Examples of jurisdictional errors include asking a wrong question, ignoring relevant material, ... An example is a civil court trying a criminal charge.
(a) the constitutionalisation of review for jurisdictional error; [Note 2] [Note 3] (b) the nature of jurisdictional error; [Note 4] (c) the consequences of jurisdictional error; [Note 5] and (d) the differences in this area of law between administrative bodies and courts. [Note 6]
The Court found that Chapter III of Australia's constitution, by implication, prevents State Parliaments from enacting legislation that would excessively limit or exclude the supervisory jurisdiction of State Supreme Courts over decisions made by inferior courts and tribunals. [2] Speaking as to these limits, the court noted that:
Huggins v. Boyd, Georgia Court of Appeals 2010 (304 Ga. App. 563) In this case involving a permanent protective order prohibiting Jonathan Huggins from stalking Karen Boyd, Huggins appealed the trial court's denial of his motion to set aside the order, arguing that the trial court had no personal jurisdiction over him. Because it was undisputed ...
Judicial misconduct occurs when a judge acts in ways that are considered unethical or otherwise violate the judge's obligations of impartial conduct.. Actions that can be classified as judicial misconduct include: conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts (as an extreme example: "falsification of facts" at summary judgment); using the ...
The role of the courts was seen as enforcing the "will of Parliament" in accordance with the doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty. However, the doctrine has been widely interpreted to include errors of law [1] and of fact and the courts have also declared the decisions taken under the royal prerogative to be amenable to judicial review. [2]
This law -related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Parliament is entitled to limit the jurisdiction of Commonwealth courts, even to the point where a case may only be able to be heard within the High Court's original jurisdiction 22. Oshlack v Richmond River Council: 1998 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Gleeson: 3352 Cost orders On the award of costs in public interest litigations 23. M v R: 1994