Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The inevitable has finally happened: Borders Books filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection today. The nation's second largest bookseller plans to close hundreds of stores and reduce costs in ...
It filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2015 and abruptly closed all its stores in 2017. Later that year, the brand was sold and relaunched as an online-only retailer. ... Borders Books closed all ...
In the United Kingdom, Borders bought 35 Books etc. stores from Philip and Richard Joseph. [citation needed] In 1998, Borders (UK) Ltd. was established as a Borders Group subsidiary and with its Borders and Books etc. After quickly becoming one of the country's leading booksellers, due to the fierce competition in the UK marketplace, a number ...
This is a list of Supreme Court of the United States cases in the area of bankruptcy. This list is a list solely of United States Supreme Court decisions about applying law related to bankruptcy. Not all Supreme Court decisions are ultimately influential and, as in other fields, not all important decisions are made at the Supreme Court level.
After price slashing and downsizing and countless "Store Closing" sales, the last word is that the venerable bookseller is asking the bankruptcy court to accept a Borders Books' Unhappy Ending ...
Toibb v. Radloff, 501 U.S. 157 (1991), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that individuals are eligible to file for relief under the reorganization provisions of chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, even if they are not engaged in a business. [1]
Borders, the bankrupt bookseller which could not find a buyer, is still selling books. ... Borders' offerings include books. Skip to main content. 24/7 help. For premium support please call: 800 ...
Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124 (1995), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that when an action has been removed from state court to a United States Bankruptcy Court, and the bankruptcy court remands to state court because of a timely-raised defect in removal procedure or lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, the removal statute precludes a United States ...