enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Texas v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Johnson

    Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech.

  3. Symbolic speech - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_speech

    Symbolic speech is a legal term in United States law used to describe actions that purposefully and discernibly convey a particular message or statement to those viewing it. [1] Symbolic speech is recognized as being protected under the First Amendment as a form of speech, but this is not expressly written as such in the document.

  4. Flag Desecration Amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_Desecration_Amendment

    A history of U.S. laws banning flag burning and other forms of flag desecration, from 1897 to the proposed Flag Desecration Amendment. On Language: Desecration. Column in the New York Times (July 31, 2005) by William Safire on the use of the word desecration in the proposed amendment. Cracking the Flag-Burning Amendment; A Brief History of Flag ...

  5. Veteran and former Playboy model detained after flag ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2015-04-20-veteran-and-former...

    Now, it's true the Supreme Court has ruled flag burning as protected symbolic speech under the First Amendment. But it's also true that federal flag code suggests proper disposal of worn or soiled ...

  6. Trump considers jail, loss of citizenship for American flag ...

    www.aol.com/article/news/2016/11/29/trump...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Fighting words - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighting_words

    Texas v. Johnson (1989) redefined the scope of fighting words to "a direct personal insult or an invitation to exchange fisticuffs" in juxtapose to flag burning as symbolic speech. [6] In R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992) and Virginia v. Black (2003), the Court held that cross burning is not 'fighting words' without intent to intimidate. In ...

  8. Harris condemns flag burning, Hamas graffiti at protest in ...

    www.aol.com/news/harris-condemns-flag-burning...

    The protests coincided with a speech to Congress by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. ... "I condemn the burning of the American flag. That flag is a symbol of our highest ideals as a ...

  9. United States v. Eichman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Eichman

    United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case that by a 5–4 decision invalidated a federal law against flag desecration as a violation of free speech under the First Amendment. [1]