Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The just or Pythagorean perfect fifth is 3/2, and the difference between the equal tempered perfect fifth and the just is a grad, the twelfth root of the Pythagorean comma (/). The equal tempered Bohlen–Pierce scale uses the interval of the thirteenth root of three ( 3 13 {\textstyle {\sqrt[{13}]{3}}} ).
[citation needed] According to the spectral theorem, the continuous functional calculus can be applied to obtain an operator T 1/2 such that T 1/2 is itself positive and (T 1/2) 2 = T. The operator T 1/2 is the unique non-negative square root of T. [citation needed] A bounded non-negative operator on a complex Hilbert space is self adjoint by ...
The four 4th roots of −1, none of which are real The three 3rd roots of −1, one of which is a negative real. An n th root of a number x, where n is a positive integer, is any of the n real or complex numbers r whose nth power is x:
Besides showing the square root of 2 in sexagesimal (1 24 51 10), the tablet also gives an example where one side of the square is 30 and the diagonal then is 42 25 35. The sexagesimal digit 30 can also stand for 0 30 = 1 / 2 , in which case 0 42 25 35 is approximately 0.7071065.
For example, the solutions to the quadratic Diophantine equation x 2 + y 2 = z 2 are given by the Pythagorean triples, originally solved by the Babylonians (c. 1800 BC). [27] Solutions to linear Diophantine equations, such as 26 x + 65 y = 13 , may be found using the Euclidean algorithm (c. 5th century BC). [ 28 ]
The radical of any integer is the largest square-free divisor of and so also described as the square-free kernel of . [2] There is no known polynomial-time algorithm for computing the square-free part of an integer.
Since f ′(1) ≠ 0 and f is smooth, it is known that any Newton iteration convergent to 1 will converge quadratically. However, if initialized at 0.5, the first few iterates of Newton's method are approximately 26214, 24904, 23658, 22476, decreasing slowly, with only the 200th iterate being 1.0371.
which can be rounded up to 2.646 to within about 99.99% accuracy (about 1 part in 10000); that is, it differs from the correct value by about 1 / 4,000 . The approximation 127 / 48 (≈ 2.645833...) is better: despite having a denominator of only 48, it differs from the correct value by less than 1 / 12,000 , or less than ...