enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Riley v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riley_v._California

    California as heard before the Supreme Court combined two cases: Riley's case and United States v. Wurie. Riley argued that the digital contents of a smartphone do not threaten the safety of police officers, and that searches for which officers only have a belief that they may find evidence of a crime still violate constitutional rights. [12]

  3. Lange v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lange_v._California

    Lange v. California, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the exigent circumstances requirement related to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled unanimously that the warrantless entry into a home by police in pursuit of a misdemeanant is not unequivocally justified.

  4. Brendlin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendlin_v._California

    But the Court noted that "incidental restrictions on freedom of movement would not tend to affect an individual's sense of security and privacy in traveling in an automobile." Indeed, the California court's holding was a kind of incentive for the police to conduct "roving patrols" that would violate the Fourth Amendment rights of drivers.

  5. Police in California aren’t immune from certain misconduct ...

    www.aol.com/police-california-aren-t-immune...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. People can't be detained just for trying to avoid police ...

    www.aol.com/news/people-cant-detained-just...

    Police officers cannot detain someone on the street just because that person acts furtively to avoid contact with them, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

  7. Lockyer v. Andrade - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockyer_v._Andrade

    Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003), [1] decided the same day as Ewing v. California (a case with a similar subject matter), [2] held that there would be no relief by means of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments.

  8. Gilbert v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilbert_v._California

    Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 (1967), was an important decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which was argued February 15–16, 1967, and decided June 12, 1967. The case involved Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment rights, the taking of handwriting exemplars, in-court identifications and warrantless searches.

  9. Can California police search my phone during a traffic stop ...

    www.aol.com/california-police-search-phone...

    California law states police can only search your phone under these conditions.