Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Argument: Oral argument: Case history; Prior: Application of Gault; 99 Ariz. 181 (1965), Supreme Court of Arizona, Rehearing denied Holding; Juveniles tried for crimes in delinquency proceedings should have the right of due process protected by the Fifth Amendment, including the right to confront witnesses and the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment.
Barnette, had established that students did have some constitutional protections in public school. This case was the first time that the court set forth standards for safeguarding public school students' free speech rights. This case involved symbolic speech, which was first recognized in Stromberg v. California. [5]
constitutionality of school voucher program Hope v. Pelzer: 536 U.S. 730 (2002) use of the hitching post in prisons is prohibited by the Eighth Amendment: Republican Party of Minnesota v. White: 536 U.S. 765 (2002) election of state judges, freedom of speech Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls
Board of Trustees of the Lemon Grove School District 1931 66625 Cal. Super. first successful school desegregation court decision in U.S. history Powell v. Alabama: 1932 287 U.S. 45 access to counsel Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada: 1938 305 U.S. 337 states that provide a school to white students must provide in-state education to blacks Smith v.
Green v. County School Board of New Kent County: Racial Segregation: 391 U.S. 430 (1968) "freedom-of-choice" desegregation plan held unconstitutional Witherspoon v. Illinois: 391 U.S. 510 (1968) constitutional status of a death-qualified jury: Pickering v. Board of Education: 391 U.S. 563 (1968) public employees' free speech rights Terry v ...
The community-based program focuses on school-level intervention for at-risk youth, and works with those who have been in the system. As is the case with Washington, the organization gets ...
Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), [2] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole are unconstitutional for juvenile offenders. [3] [4] The ruling applied even to those persons who had committed murder as a juvenile, extending beyond Graham v.
A Star-Telegram investigation finds Tarrant County Judge Alex Kim’s unorthodox methods — akin to courtroom reality TV —exposed children to the darkest elements of online trolling and racism.