Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Pit bull–type dog wearing a muzzle. In law, breed-specific legislation (BSL) is a type of law that prohibits or restricts particular breeds or types of dog. [1] Such laws range from outright bans on the possession of these dogs, to restrictions and conditions on ownership, and often establishes a legal presumption that such dogs are dangerous or vicious to prevent dog attacks.
Unlike the state provisions about dangerous dogs, the Idaho statute that defines animal cruelty is not specific. That means that prosecutors must “start from square one” to prove in court that ...
Generally, violations of Ohio's dangerous dog laws are misdemeanors. Echelbarger died Thursday when she was attacked by two dogs in her yard in a condo complex on Kildow Court in Ashville.
West Virginia and Wisconsin are states that do not have a law that requires dogs to be leashed. Still, they do have laws that hold dog owners and keepers liable for all damages caused by dogs that are permitted to run at large. Different law applies to dangerous dogs and female dogs as in different states they are prohibited to run at large at ...
Citing examples of dangerous-dog databases maintained by the state of Virginia; Volusia County in Florida; and Minneapolis, the grand jury recommended the county "develop a plan for collecting ...
Enact stringent animal control laws and increase enforcement; Enact dangerous dog laws that place primary responsibility for a dog’s behavior on the owner; Target chronically irresponsible dog owners; Encourage dog owners to seek professional help in training and socializing their pets; Enforce leash laws; Enforce laws against dog fighting
"If you look at the definition for dangerous dog under state law, it is very specific to the kind of injury that has to be sustained by a victim in order to reach that dangerous dog classification ...
At common law, a dog owner can be held liable for the injury caused by a dog that the owner knows, or has reason to know, may be dangerous. Many common law jurisdictions have historically recognized a "one bite" rule, meaning that absent information that suggests that a dog may be unusually dangerous to others, a dog owner cannot be held liable ...