enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : Your alma mater is not your ticket to Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Your_alma_mater...

    Adding the name of a non-notable individual to a stand-alone list of alumni is bad for several reasons. It undermines Wikipedia's legitimacy as an encyclopedia. Facebook, LinkedIn and other social networking sites provide people a forum to discuss their lives. Wikipedia is meant to provide factual information about notable topics.

  3. Wikipedia:Donation appeal ideas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Wikipedia:Donation_appeal_ideas

    Wikipedia brings free knowledge to the world. Please consider making a donation to support our operations. Wikipedia is non-profit and free of advertising. Please consider making a donation. Wikipedia is free for you, but not free for us. Consider a donation to keep our mission strong. Make a donation to Wikipedia and give the gift of knowledge!

  4. Wikipedia:Not gonna donate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Not_gonna_donate

    The people you are addressing would not have been helped by the donation. In the vast majority of cases, what you're saying is not being seen by anyone who is actually employed by the Wikimedia Foundation that receives financial donations. The editing and deletion discussions are attended by unpaid volunteers instead.

  5. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming...

    This guideline contains conventions on how to name Wikipedia articles about individual people. It should be read in conjunction with Wikipedia's general policy on article naming, Wikipedia:Article titles, and, for articles on living or recently deceased people, also in conjunction with the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, which explicitly also applies to article titles.

  6. Wikipedia : Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to...

    Wikipedia's goal is not merely to be a directory of things and people that currently exist today – defunct corporations and ghost towns and dead people can still be notable, and can still have legitimate and reliably sourceable reasons why readers might be looking for information about who and what they were.

  7. Wikipedia:Username policy/Examples - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Username_policy/...

    In borderline cases, it should not be necessary to immediately block the username but rather to attempt to discuss the problem. For instance, not every name that includes "Jimbo" is a misleading reference to Jimbo Wales or impersonating him; there are many people named Jimbo, and new users may not even know who Jimbo Wales is. Similarly, not ...

  8. Wikipedia talk : Naming conventions (common names)/Archive 1

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Naming...

    Because that's not what people use. People named William and James get their names shortened. People named George typically do not. People named Ronald sometimes do, but when they also have sons named Ronald, calling the elder Ronald and the younger Ron is perhaps the best way to disambiguate. That's just how the names work.

  9. Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_really...

    That time you got a girlfriend (Seriously, you're editing Wikipedia. Be realistic). An article about an essay that uses Hangman to explain the subject. We already have the essay, don't need the article too. An article that is just a resume so you can possibly get hired by people who googled your name. It’s not quirky, it’s just unsourced ...