Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The 1820 United States census was the fourth census conducted in the United States. It was conducted on August 7, 1820. The 1820 census included six new states: Louisiana, Indiana, Mississippi, Illinois, Alabama and Maine. There has been a district wide loss of 1820 census records for Arkansas Territory, Missouri Territory, [1] and New Jersey.
Lee won prizes for his sheep in 1806. In the 1810 census, Lee owned 69 enslaved persons. [20] In the 1820 census, he owned 44 slaves, of whom 25 were engaged in agriculture. [21] In the final census of his life, Lee owned 24 slaves, and like in the previous census, his wife did not live on the plantation. [22]
August 7 – The 1820 United States census is conducted, eventually determining a population of 11,176,475. December 3 – U.S. presidential election, 1820: James Monroe is re-elected, virtually unopposed.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1820_census&oldid=990643185"This page was last edited on 25 November 2020, at 17:55 (UTC). (UTC).
This resulted in about 162 initial articles, of which 86 were front-page articles, with each linked to around 25 related topical sub-pages. For example, the front-page article New Jersey Genealogy was linked to the New Jersey Biography, New Jersey Cemeteries, and New Jersey Census pages. Much of the early structure and phrasing of the wiki can ...
Rev. Ruffner owned 4 slaves in the 1820 federal census, [11] 6 slaves in the 1830 federal census, [12] and 4 slaves in the 1840 federal census. [13] He may have freed his slaves after his 1847 publications discussed below, but is missing from the 1850 census as digitized, though entries include merchant Lewis Ruffner in Louisville, Kentucky ...
Bottom line. Ultimately, whether you can retire on less than $1 million will largely depend on your spending needs during retirement and your remaining life expectancy.
New York did not conduct a census in 1885 because its Governor David B. Hill refused to support the proposed census due to its extravagance and cost. [16] [17] Governor Hill objected to the idea of spending so much state money on a state census that was as extravagant as the 1880 U.S. Census. [16] [17]