enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Reynolds - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Reynolds

    Case history; Prior: Judgments entered in favor of the plaintiffs upheld, Reynolds v.United States, 192 F.2d 987 (3d Cir. 1951); cert. granted, 343 U.S. 918 (1952).: Holding; In this case, there was a valid claim of privilege under Rule 34; and a judgment based under Rule 37 on refusal to produce the documents subjected the United States to liability to which Congress did not consent by the ...

  3. Reynolds v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_v._United_States

    Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878), was a Supreme Court of the United States case which held that religious duty was not a defense to a criminal indictment. [1] Reynolds was the first Supreme Court opinion to address the First Amendment's protection of religious liberties, impartial juries and the Confrontation Clauses of the Sixth ...

  4. State secrets privilege - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_secrets_privilege

    The state secrets privilege is related to, but distinct from, several other legal doctrines: the principle of non-justiciability in certain cases involving state secrets (the so-called "Totten Rule"); [6] certain prohibitions on the publication of classified information (as in New York Times Co. v. United States, the Pentagon Papers case); and the use of classified information in criminal ...

  5. Reynolds v. United States (2012) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_v._United_States...

    Reynolds v. United States 565 U.S. 432 (2012) is a Supreme Court case regarding sex offender registration prior to enactment of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. [ 1 ]

  6. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) Religious belief or duty cannot be used as a defense against a criminal indictment. Davis v. Beason, 133 U.S. 333 (1890) The Edmunds Anti-Polygamy Act of 1882 does not violate the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment even though polygamy is part of several religious beliefs. Cantwell v.

  7. US Supreme Court rejects tobacco firms' appeal over graphic ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-sidesteps...

    In a separate case involving the FDA, the Supreme Court on Dec. 2 is set to hear arguments over the agency's denial of applications to sell flavored vape products. (Reporting by John Kruzel ...

  8. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 397

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 397 ... Date decided United States v. Kordel: 397 U.S. 1: 1970: United States v. Reynolds ...

  9. Reynolds v. Sims - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_v._Sims

    Reynolds v. Sims , 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population.