Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The parametric equivalent of the Kruskal–Wallis test is the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A significant Kruskal–Wallis test indicates that at least one sample stochastically dominates one other sample. The test does not identify where this stochastic dominance occurs or for how many pairs of groups stochastic dominance obtains.
The critical value is the number that the test statistic must exceed to reject the test. In this case, F crit (2,15) = 3.68 at α = 0.05. Since F=9.3 > 3.68, the results are significant at the 5% significance level. One would not accept the null hypothesis, concluding that there is strong evidence that the expected values in the three groups ...
The most common non-parametric test for the one-factor model is the Kruskal-Wallis test. The Kruskal-Wallis test is based on the ranks of the data. The advantage of the Van Der Waerden test is that it provides the high efficiency of the standard ANOVA analysis when the normality assumptions are in fact satisfied, but it also provides the ...
Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks: tests whether > 2 independent samples are drawn from the same distribution. Kuiper's test: tests whether a sample is drawn from a given distribution, sensitive to cyclic variations such as day of the week. Logrank test: compares survival distributions of two right-skewed, censored samples.
There are some alternatives to conventional one-way analysis of variance, e.g.: Welch's heteroscedastic F test, Welch's heteroscedastic F test with trimmed means and Winsorized variances, Brown-Forsythe test, Alexander-Govern test, James second order test and Kruskal-Wallis test, available in onewaytests R
Trump said he’s heard that the number of autism cases has dramatically increased from more than one in 100,000 about 30 years ago to “one in 100” now.
In statistics, the Jonckheere trend test [1] (sometimes called the Jonckheere–Terpstra [2] test) is a test for an ordered alternative hypothesis within an independent samples (between-participants) design. It is similar to the Kruskal-Wallis test in that the null hypothesis is that several independent samples are from the same population ...
From September 2008 to December 2012, if you bought shares in companies when Philip A. Laskawy joined the board, and sold them when he left, you would have a -91.8 percent return on your investment, compared to a 11.6 percent return from the S&P 500.