Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The woman was in the process of applying for a court-issued no-contact order. She told Enriquez not to contact her and blocked him on all devices. ... offers information and advice for stalking ...
It’s illegal for a correction’s officer to have any kind of sexual contact with an inmate whether or not it is consensual, according to Washington state law. ... ordering a no contact order ...
Laughlin resigned from duty April 20, 2018, following two arrests and violations of a no-contact order. ... Washington state hotline for reporting child abuse and neglect, 866-829-2153.
The Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) removed Maile from Biryukova's home in the wake of her brother's disappearance and placed her into foster care. Solomon was granted twice-weekly visitation while petitioning the court hearing the divorce to grant him custody, which it did after removing the remaining ...
In November 2018, he was convicted of three counts of second-degree assault, two counts of felony harassment, two counts of violating a no-contact order, one count of felony stalking and one count of fourth-degree assault. Court papers state that he was the third Bellingham police officer in three years to be arrested for assault. [16]
The Special Commitment Center (SCC) in the US state of Washington is a post-prison-sentence treatment institution for people designated as sexually violent predators, located on McNeil Island. Civil commitment is the subject of controversy because it allows the involuntary civil confinement of a sex offender after the court's sentence has been ...
A post-conviction no-contact order was not put in place between Robinson and the cat’s owner. ... Washington state hotline for reporting child abuse and neglect, 866-829-2153.
On June 7, 2018, the Supreme Court declared the state had fully covered the funding of basic education, lifting the contempt order and $100,000 a day fine, ending any judicial oversight of the case. [10] [11] In the McCleary ruling, the Supreme Court cited teacher pay as a primary issue with the failure of the state to fund public education. [12]