enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Alexandrian text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrian_text-type

    In textual criticism of the New Testament, the Alexandrian text-type is one of the main text types. It is the text type favored by the majority of modern textual critics and it is the basis for most modern (after 1900) Bible translations. Over 5,800 New Testament manuscripts have been classified into four groups by text type.

  3. Minuscule 1739 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minuscule_1739

    [9]: 823 [n 1] Biblical scholar Bart D. Ehrman says this reading is an Orthodox corrupt reading. [10] Due to its affinities with 𝔓 46 and Codex Vaticanus, scholar G. Zuntz concluded, "[w]ithin the wider affinities of the ‘Alexandrian’ tradition, the Vaticanus is now seen to stand out as a member of a group with P46 and the preancestor of ...

  4. Textual criticism of the New Testament - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism_of_the...

    For some books of the Bible, Erasmus used just single manuscripts, and for small sections made his own translations into Greek from the Vulgate. [25] However, following Westcott and Hort , most modern New Testament textual critics have concluded that the Byzantine text-type was formalised at a later date than the Alexandrian and Western text-types.

  5. Our Authorized Bible Vindicated - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Authorized_Bible...

    Our Authorized Bible Vindicated is a book written by Seventh-day Adventist scholar Benjamin G. Wilkinson advocating the King James Only (KJO) position, published in 1930. It asserted that some of the new versions of the Bible coming out, came from manuscripts with corruptions introduced into the Septuagint with additional texts, which came to be called "Apocrypha", and manuscripts with ...

  6. An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Historical_Account_of...

    The account claimed to review the textual evidence available [2] from ancient sources on two disputed Bible passages: 1 John 5:7 and 1 Timothy 3:16. Newton describes this letter as "an account of what the reading has been in all ages, and what steps it has been changed, as far as I can hitherto determine by records", [ 3 ] and "a criticism ...

  7. Textual variants in the Acts of the Apostles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    An abbreviated list of textual variants in this particular book is given in this article below. Most of the variations are not significant and some common alterations include the deletion, rearrangement, repetition, or replacement of one or more words when the copyist's eye returns to a similar word in the wrong location of the original text.

  8. Comparison of codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_codices...

    A recent scientific comparative study of interest published on these two Alexandrian codices is "The Relationship between Vaticanus & Sinaiticus and the Majority Text in Galatians" by Dr. Graham G. Thomason and "THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SPLIT TEXT-TYPES FOR THE RECOVERY OF THE ORIGINAL TEXT OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT" by Dr LESLIE McFALL - both are ...

  9. Criticism of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible

    Specific collections of biblical writings, such as the Hebrew Bible and Christian Bibles, are considered sacred and authoritative by their respective faith groups. [11] The limits of the canon were effectively set by the proto-orthodox churches from the 1st throughout the 4th century; however, the status of the scriptures has been a topic of scholarly discussion in the later churches.