Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Jul. 28—In 2021, an average of 41 people were detained daily for mental health crises in Washington. Authorities "totally disregarded" the law by holding some people in psychiatric hospitals too ...
The Special Commitment Center (SCC) in the US state of Washington is a post-prison-sentence treatment institution for people designated as sexually violent predators, located on McNeil Island. Civil commitment is the subject of controversy because it allows the involuntary civil confinement of a sex offender after the court's sentence has been ...
Washington State's Community Protection Act of 1990 authorizes the civil commitment of "sexually violent predators," or persons who suffer from a mental abnormality or personality disorder that makes them likely to engage in predatory acts of sexual violence.
State law governs involuntary commitment, and procedures vary from state to state. In some jurisdictions , laws regarding the commitment of juveniles may vary, with what is the de facto involuntary commitment of a juvenile perhaps de jure defined as "voluntary" if his parents agree, though he may still have a right to protest and attempt to get ...
Jun. 27—SANTA FE — Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham has scrapped a proposal for debate at next month's special session that was intended to expand court-supervised outpatient treatment for people ...
Donaldson that involuntary hospitalization and/or treatment violates an individual's civil rights. The individual must be exhibiting behavior that is a danger to themselves or others and a court order must be received for more than a short (e.g. 72-hour) detention. The treatment must take place in the least restrictive setting possible.
State lawmakers passed the Community Protection Act of 1990 to hold people after their prison sentence if there was reason to believe they might reoffend in a sexually predatory manner, making ...
Rogers v. Okin was a landmark case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit considered whether a person diagnosed with mental illness committed to a state psychiatric facility and assumed to be competent, has the right to make treatment decisions in non-emergency conditions.