enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Strategic dominance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_dominance

    For example, B is "throw rock" while A is "throw scissors" in Rock, Paper, Scissors. This notion can be generalized beyond the comparison of two strategies. Strategy B is strictly dominant if strategy B strictly dominates every other possible strategy. Strategy B is weakly dominant if strategy B weakly dominates every other possible strategy.

  3. Nash equilibrium - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium

    The free money game is an example of a "special" game with an even number of equilibria. In it, two players have to both vote "yes" rather than "no" to get a reward and the votes are simultaneous. There are two pure-strategy Nash equilibria, (yes, yes) and (no, no), and no mixed strategy equilibria, because the strategy "yes" weakly dominates "no".

  4. Incentive compatibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incentive_compatibility

    In game theory and economics, a mechanism is called incentive-compatible (IC) [1]: 415 if every participant can achieve their own best outcome by reporting their true preferences. [ 1 ] : 225 [ 2 ] For example, there is incentive compatibility if high-risk clients are better off in identifying themselves as high-risk to insurance firms , who ...

  5. Risk dominance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_dominance

    Risk dominance and payoff dominance are two related refinements of the Nash equilibrium (NE) solution concept in game theory, defined by John Harsanyi and Reinhard Selten.A Nash equilibrium is considered payoff dominant if it is Pareto superior to all other Nash equilibria in the game. 1 When faced with a choice among equilibria, all players would agree on the payoff dominant equilibrium since ...

  6. Guess 2/3 of the average - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guess_2/3_of_the_average

    This game is a common demonstration in game theory classes. It reveals the significant heterogeneity of behaviour. [11] It is unlikely that many people will play rationally according to the Nash equilibrium. This is because the game has no strictly dominant strategy, so it requires players to consider what others will do.

  7. Strong Nash equilibrium - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_Nash_equilibrium

    If x is not an SNE, the condition requires that one can move to a different strategy-profile which is a social-welfare-best-response for all coalitions simultaneously. For example, consider a game with two players, with strategy spaces [1/3, 2] and [3/4, 2], which are clearly compact and convex. The utility functions are: u1(x) = - x1 2 + x2 + 1

  8. Stag hunt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stag_hunt

    Formally, a stag hunt is a game with two pure strategy Nash equilibria—one that is risk dominant and another that is payoff dominant. The payoff matrix in Figure 1 illustrates a generic stag hunt, where > >. In addition to the pure strategy Nash equilibria there is one mixed strategy Nash equilibrium. This equilibrium depends on the payoffs ...

  9. Game theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_theory

    Another use of game theory in managerial economics is in analyzing pricing strategies. For example, firms may use game theory to determine the optimal pricing strategy based on how they expect their competitors to respond to their pricing decisions. Overall, game theory serves as a useful tool for analyzing strategic interactions and decision ...