Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The counterfeit pills sold through illegal internet-based pharmacies frequently contain fentanyl, a synthetic opioid that is the leading cause of drug overdoses in the United States, the health ...
Troubled by prescription costs and accessibility, Americans seek solutions online, but experts say that may not be the best idea. Troubled by prescription costs and accessibility, Americans seek ...
With the launch of Operation Pangea [12] in 2008, for the first time illegal online pharmacies were targeted at the international level. In particular, the operation targeted three main components used by illegal websites: the ISP (Internet Service Provider), the payment systems and the delivery service. Along the years the operation gained ...
A death threat is a threat, often made anonymously, by one person or a group of people to kill another person or group of people. These threats are often designed to intimidate victims in order to manipulate their behaviour, in which case a death threat could be a form of coercion. For example, a death threat could be used to dissuade a public ...
The illegal online scheme brought in more than $9 million in revenue in about three years, officials said.
A terroristic threat is a threat to commit a crime of violence or a threat to cause bodily injury to another person and terrorization as the result of the proscribed conduct. [1] Several U.S. states have enacted statutes which impose criminal liability for "terroristic threatening" or "making a terroristic threat." [2]
Illegal pharmacies are “exposing patients to risks related to unregulated, low-quality, potentially contaminated products. The average person cannot be expected to safely navigate this online ...
Elonis v. United States, 575 U.S. 723 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether conviction of threatening another person over interstate lines (under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) [1]) requires proof of subjective intent to threaten or whether it is enough to show that a "reasonable person" would regard the statement as threatening. [2]