Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In proof complexity, a Frege system is a propositional proof system whose proofs are sequences of formulas derived using a finite set of sound and implicationally complete inference rules. [1] Frege systems (more often known as Hilbert systems in general proof theory ) are named after Gottlob Frege .
In logic, more specifically proof theory, a Hilbert system, sometimes called Hilbert calculus, Hilbert-style system, Hilbert-style proof system, Hilbert-style deductive system or Hilbert–Ackermann system, is a type of formal proof system attributed to Gottlob Frege [1] and David Hilbert. [2]
This is a list of mathematical logic topics. For traditional syllogistic logic, see the list of topics in logic . See also the list of computability and complexity topics for more theory of algorithms .
A propositional proof system is given as a proof-verification algorithm P(A,x) with two inputs.If P accepts the pair (A,x) we say that x is a P-proof of A.P is required to run in polynomial time, and moreover, it must hold that A has a P-proof if and only if A is a tautology.
The notion of analytic proof was introduced by Gentzen for the sequent calculus; there the analytic proofs are those that are cut-free. Much of the interest in cut-free proofs comes from the subformula property: every formula in the end sequent of a cut-free proof is a subformula of one of the premises. This allows one to show consistency of ...
A proof system includes the components: [1] [2] Formal language: The set L of formulas admitted by the system, for example, propositional logic or first-order logic. Rules of inference: List of rules that can be employed to prove theorems from axioms and theorems. Axioms: Formulas in L assumed to be valid. All theorems are derived from axioms.
In general, a proof system for a language L is a polynomial-time function whose range is L. Thus, a propositional proof system is a proof system for TAUT. Sometimes the following alternative definition is considered: a pps is given as a proof-verification algorithm P(A,x) with two inputs. If P accepts the pair (A,x) we say that x is a P-proof of A.
Johansson's minimal logic can be axiomatized by any of the axiom systems for positive propositional calculus and expanding its language with the nullary connective , with no additional axiom schemas. Alternatively, it can also be axiomatized in the language { → , ∧ , ∨ , ¬ } {\displaystyle \{\to ,\land ,\lor ,\neg \}} by expanding the ...