enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Texas v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Johnson

    Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech.

  3. United States involvement in regime change in Latin America

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement...

    The US government supported the 1971 coup led by General Hugo Banzer that toppled President Juan José Torres of Bolivia. [9] Torres had displeased Washington by convening an "Asamblea del Pueblo" (Assembly of the Town), in which representatives of specific proletarian sectors of society were represented (miners, unionized teachers, students, peasants), and more generally by leading the ...

  4. United States v. Johnson (1968) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Johnson...

    Justice Douglas reversed for a 5-3 majority. He held that the provisions of 207(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 making the remedies provided in Title II of the Act the exclusive means of enforcing rights based on such part do not preclude a criminal prosecution of the defendants under 18 USC 241, since the exclusive-remedy provision applies only to enforcement of substantive rights to ...

  5. Chicago Appeals Court rules in favor of Illinois gun ban ...

    www.aol.com/chicago-appeals-court-rules-favor...

    CHICAGO (WTVO) — A federal appeals court in Chicago ruled that the Illinois assault weapon ban can remain in effect while the law is debated. This decision came on Thursday as lawyers ...

  6. United States v. Johnson (1982) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Johnson...

    On certiorari, the United States Supreme Court affirmed 5-4. In an opinion by Blackmun, J., it was held that the rule announced in Payton v.New York applies to a case which was pending on direct appeal when Payton was decided, Payton not having applied settled precedent to a new set of facts, not having announced an entirely new and unanticipated principle of law, nor having held either that ...

  7. Richard Haynes (lawyer) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Haynes_(lawyer)

    A native of Houston, Texas, Haynes graduated from the University of Houston Law Center in 1956, and was admitted to the State Bar of Texas on April 23, 1956. [2] During one stretch, he reportedly won 163 drunk-driving cases in a row. [3] He was involved in landmark cases such as The State of Texas v.

  8. Chicago just spent more than $80K to renovate, furnish the ...

    www.aol.com/finance/chicago-just-spent-more-80k...

    The city of Chicago is facing a massive budget shortfall of nearly one billion dollars for 2025.. In an effort to limit the shortfall, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson told reporters "everything is ...

  9. Chicago appeals court rejects R. Kelly 's challenge of 20 ...

    www.aol.com/news/chicago-appeals-court-rejects-r...

    The singer R. Kelly was correctly sentenced to 20 years in prison on child sex convictions in Chicago, a federal appeals court ruled Friday. Jurors in 2022 convicted the Grammy Award-winning R&B ...