enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Structure of policy debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_of_policy_debate

    In addition to speeches, policy debates may allow for a certain amount of preparation time, or "prep time", during a debate round. NSDA rules call for five minutes of total prep time that can be used, although in practice high school debate tournaments often give eight minutes of prep time. College debates typically have 10 minutes of ...

  3. Policy debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Policy_debate

    Policy debaters' speed of delivery will vary from league to league and tournament to tournament. In more progressive and larger tournaments, debaters will speak very quickly - often called spreading - in order to read as much evidence and make as many arguments as possible within the time-constrained speech.

  4. Inter-collegiate policy debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter-Collegiate_policy_debate

    Inter-collegiate and high school policy debate are largely similar. Some of the differences: High school debate has its own, separate, leagues and tournaments. High school constructives are typically only 8 minutes, and high school rebuttals are typically only 5 minutes. College times are typically 9 minute constructives and 6 minute rebuttals.

  5. Competitive debate in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competitive_debate_in_the...

    Because there are a substantial number of plans the affirmative could run, policy debate requires substantially more research than other topics. [41] [43] Lincoln-Douglas debate is a 1v1 style of debate based on the structure of the Lincoln–Douglas debates of 1858. Lincoln-Douglas topics change every two months and are typically statements of ...

  6. Stock issues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_issues

    Other components have been advocated by advanced debaters and can be found during some tournament rounds of intercollegiate policy debate. These types of arguments or, sometimes, components of policy debate, can be linked to stock issues by good debaters. Typicality: Is the Affirmative case or plan good enough for the resolution?

  7. National Parliamentary Debate Association - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Parliamentary...

    Art, Argument, and Advocacy: Mastering Parliamentary Debate by John Meany and Kate Shuster, best for intermediate and advanced [4] On That Point: Introduction to Parliamentary Debate by John Meany, good for beginners [5] Burden of Proof: An Introductory Guide to Argumentation and Guide to Parliamentary Debate by Mark Crossman, good for ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Advantage (debate) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advantage_(debate)

    In competitive debate, an advantage is the way that the affirmative team refers to the positive consequences of adopting their position on the debate resolution. It is an argument structure that seeks to convince the judge that the affirmative plan, if adopted, would result in a net-beneficial improvement to the status quo. [1]