enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Heuristic (psychology) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic_(psychology)

    On the other hand, common but mundane events are hard to bring to mind, so their likelihoods tend to be underestimated. These include deaths from suicides, strokes, and diabetes. This heuristic is one of the reasons why people are more easily swayed by a single, vivid story than by a large body of statistical evidence. [60]

  3. Representativeness heuristic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representativeness_heuristic

    However, the incidence of the disease is 1/10,000. The patient's actual risk of having the disease is 1%, because the population of healthy people is so much larger than the disease. This statistic often surprises people, due to the base rate fallacy, as many people do not take the basic incidence into account when judging probability. [12]

  4. Cognitive bias - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_bias

    The various biases demonstrated in these psychological experiments suggest that people will frequently fail to do all these things. [35] However, they fail to do so in systematic, directional ways that are predictable. [4] In some academic disciplines, the study of bias is very popular.

  5. List of cognitive biases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases

    The tendency for some people, especially those with depression, to overestimate the likelihood of negative things happening to them. (compare optimism bias) Present bias: The tendency of people to give stronger weight to payoffs that are closer to the present time when considering trade-offs between two future moments. [111] Plant blindness

  6. Social heuristics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_heuristics

    This method is known as applying bounded rationality, where an individual makes a collective and rational choice that considers “the limits of human capability to calculate, the severe deficiencies of human knowledge about the consequences of choice, and the limits of human ability to adjudicate among multiple goals”. [4]

  7. “How Can Humans Be So Awful?”: True Crime Mania Has Dark ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/humans-awful-gen-z-true...

    So if you can put yourself in this world, where it can be fixed, it has to look really appealing,” Christina explained. “It allows you to go in a world where things were chaotic and horrible ...

  8. Overconfidence effect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overconfidence_effect

    If human confidence had perfect calibration, judgments with 100% confidence would be correct 100% of the time, 90% confidence correct 90% of the time, and so on for the other levels of confidence. By contrast, the key finding is that confidence exceeds accuracy so long as the subject is answering hard questions about an unfamiliar topic.

  9. Why are people so bad at texting? The psychology behind bad ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/why-people-bad-texting...

    While bad texters typically refer to people who flake on responding, there are also people who do respond to texts, but do so in a way that leaves the recipient feeling cold. Assuming one has a ...