Ads
related to: st louis court case searchcourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- State Court Record Search
Search Our Database For Court Info
Answer Your Burning Questions Now!
- Court Criminal Check
Court Records, Millions Of Citizens
Available In Our Database. Search
- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- State Court Record Search
infotracer.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Muldrow v. City of St. Louis (Docket 22-193) was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects against discriminatory job transfers even where the transfer does not result in a significant disadvantage.
Rachel v. Walker (1834) was a "freedom suit" filed in the St. Louis Circuit Court by an African woman named Rachel who had been enslaved.She petitioned for her freedom and that of her son James (John) Henry from William Walker (a slave trader), based on having been held illegally as a slave in the free territory of Michigan by a previous master, an Army officer.
These cases can then be appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [3] The Court is based in St. Louis but is organized into three divisions: Eastern, Northern, and Southeastern. The court for the Eastern division is held in downtown St. Louis, in the Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse, where the
They are also available for study online. These records show that within Missouri, jurors often decided in favor of the enslaved. Freedom suit plaintiffs gained freedom in 37 percent of the cases filed in the St. Louis circuit court. [15] The first freedom suit in St. Louis was filed in 1805 by Marguerite Scypion, an African-Natchez woman. [15]
Although the judgment and appeal to the Missouri Supreme Court initially went against Marguerite and her sisters, the case was reviewed in 1834, and a new trial was ordered. [4] Because of the political and economic prominence of the extended Chouteau family in St. Louis, Marguerite's attorneys requested a change of venue, which the court granted.
Emerson case was tried by the state in 1847 in the federal-state courthouse in St. Louis. Scott's lawyer was originally Francis B. Murdoch and later Charles D. Drake. As more than a year elapsed from the time of the initial petition filing until the trial, Drake had moved away from St. Louis during that time. Samuel M. Bay tried the case in ...
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case that held that racially restrictive housing covenants cannot legally be enforced.. The case arose after an African-American family purchased a house in St. Louis that was subject to a restrictive covenant preventing "people of the Negro or Mongolian Race" from occupying the property.
The east wing has Circuit Court #13 restored to its 1910 appearance, while the west wing has Circuit Court #4 restored to an approximate 1850s detail. [6] The courthouse building was the tallest building in Missouri and St. Louis until 1896 when Union Station was built.
Ads
related to: st louis court case searchcourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
infotracer.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month