enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swierkiewicz_v._Sorema_N._A.

    Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 26, 2002. The Court held that for complaints in employment discrimination cases, a plaintiff is not required to allege specific facts that establish a prima facie case as required by the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework.

  3. Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Express_Corp._v...

    Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki, 552 U.S. 389 (2008), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 27, 2008. The ruling provided guidance on what would constitute an adequate filing under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA).

  4. Frazier v. Cupp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frazier_v._Cupp

    Later case law has interpreted Frazier v. Cupp as the case permitting police deception during interrogations. The language of the ruling did not specifically state which forms of police deception were acceptable, but the ruling provided a precedent for a confession being voluntary even though deceptive tactics were used.

  5. Garrity v. New Jersey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrity_v._New_Jersey

    Garrity v. New Jersey , 385 U.S. 493 (1967), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that law enforcement officers and other public employees have the right to be free from compulsory self-incrimination. [ 1 ]

  6. 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14_Penn_Plaza_LLC_v._Pyett

    14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, 556 U.S. 247 (2009), is a United States labor law case decided by the United States Supreme Court on the rights of unionized workers to sue their employer for age discrimination.

  7. Supreme Court Rules for Employees in Unusual Anti ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/2011/01/24/supreme-court-rules...

    By a unanimous 8-0 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that anti-discrimination laws forbid employers from firing a complaining employee's fiance. In the case of Thompson v. North American Stainless ...

  8. National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Coalition_for_Men...

    The law was challenged on the basis of gender discrimination, leading to the Supreme Court case Rostker v. Goldberg. In that 1981 case, the Supreme Court ruled that the practice of requiring only men to register for the draft was constitutional on the basis that women were restricted from serving in combat roles. Oral Argument before the 9th ...

  9. Kingsley v. Hendrickson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingsley_v._Hendrickson

    Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 576 U.S. 389 (2015), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held in a 5–4 decision that a pretrial detainee must prove only that force used by police is excessive according to an objective standard, not that a police officer was subjectively aware that the force used was unreasonable.