enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Section 1782 discovery - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_1782_Discovery

    Section 1782 of Title 28 of the United States Code is a federal statute that allows a litigant to a legal proceeding outside the United States to apply to an American court to obtain evidence for use in the non-US proceeding, a process known as discovery. The full name of Section 1782 is "Assistance to foreign and international tribunals and to ...

  3. Arbitration case law in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration_case_law_in...

    Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto, 517 U.S. 681 (1996): Montana law requiring disclosure of arbitration clauses to be "typed in underlined capital letters on the first page of the contract" preempted by FAA; [1] however, upheld authority of courts to refuse to enforce arbitration clauses on grounds of "generally applicable contract ...

  4. Arbitration in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration_in_the_United...

    Arbitration, in the context of the law of the United States, is a form of alternative dispute resolution.Specifically, arbitration is an alternative to litigation through which the parties to a dispute agree to submit their respective evidence and legal arguments to a third party (i.e., the arbitrator) for resolution.

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Although 28 U.S.C. §1782(a) permits a district court to order discovery “for use in a proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal,” only a governmental or intergovernmental adjudicative body may qualify as such a tribunal, and the arbitration panels in these cases are not such adjudicative bodies. Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana

  6. Taylor v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_v._Illinois

    In 1974, the California Supreme Court ordered the legislature to create the discovery system, ending the state's experiment with judicial discovery rule-making. [4] [5] In 1970, the United States Supreme Court first set down principles in terms of the constitutionality of discovery rules. In Williams v.

  7. Consumer arbitration - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_arbitration

    Disputes between consumers and businesses that are arbitrated are resolved by an independent neutral arbitrator rather than in court. Although parties can agree to arbitrate a particular dispute after it arises or may agree that the award is non-binding, most consumer arbitrations occur pursuant to a pre-dispute arbitration clause where the arbitrator's award is binding.

  8. Motion to compel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_to_compel

    A motion to compel asks the court to order either the opposing party or a third party to take some action. This sort of motion most commonly deals with discovery disputes, when a party who has propounded discovery to either the opposing party or a third party believes that the discovery responses are insufficient. The motion to compel is used ...

  9. Discovery (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_(law)

    Civil rights cases concluded in U.S. district courts, by disposition, 1990–2006 [1]. Discovery, in the law of common law jurisdictions, is a phase of pretrial procedure in a lawsuit in which each party, through the law of civil procedure, can obtain evidence from other parties.