enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sherman Antitrust Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman_Antitrust_Act

    The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 [1] (26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1–7) is a United States antitrust law which prescribes the rule of free competition among those engaged in commerce and consequently prohibits unfair monopolies. It was passed by Congress and is named for Senator John Sherman, its principal author.

  3. United States v. E. C. Knight Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._E._C...

    United States v. E. C. Knight Co., 156 U.S. 1 (1895), also known as the "Sugar Trust Case," was a United States Supreme Court antitrust case that severely limited the federal government's power to pursue antitrust actions under the Sherman Antitrust Act.

  4. United States antitrust law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_antitrust_law

    American antitrust law formally began in 1890 with the U.S. Congress's passage of the Sherman Act, although a few U.S. states had passed local antitrust laws during the preceding year. [12] Using broad and general terms, the Sherman Act outlawed "monopoliz[ation]" and "every contract, combination ... or conspiracy in restraint of trade".

  5. History of United States antitrust law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_United_States...

    Standard Oil (Refinery No. 1 in Cleveland, Ohio, pictured) was a major company broken up under United States antitrust laws.. The history of United States antitrust law is generally taken to begin with the Sherman Antitrust Act 1890, although some form of policy to regulate competition in the market economy has existed throughout the common law's history.

  6. Rule of reason - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_reason

    The rule of reason is a legal doctrine used to interpret the Sherman Antitrust Act, one of the cornerstones of United States antitrust law.While some actions like price-fixing are considered illegal per se, other actions, such as possession of a monopoly, must be analyzed under the rule of reason and are only considered illegal when their effect is to unreasonably restrain trade.

  7. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co...

    Sherman Antitrust Act Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California , 509 U.S. 764 (1993), was a controversial United States Supreme Court case which held that foreign companies acting in foreign countries could nevertheless be held liable for violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act if they conspired to restrain trade within the United States , and ...

  8. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Oil_Co._of_New...

    Sherman Antitrust Act United States , 221 U.S. 1 (1911), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled that John D. Rockefeller 's petroleum conglomerate Standard Oil had illegally monopolized the American petroleum industry and ordered the company to break itself up. [ 1 ]

  9. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._South...

    South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U.S. 533 (1944), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Sherman Act, the federal antitrust statute, applied to insurance. To reach this decision, the Court held that insurance could be regulated by the United States Congress under the Commerce Clause , overturning Paul v.