Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Even when they terminate, parsers that use recursive descent with backtracking may require exponential time. Although predictive parsers are widely used, and are frequently chosen if writing a parser by hand, programmers often prefer to use a table-based parser produced by a parser generator , [ citation needed ] either for an LL( k ) language ...
Context-free languages are a category of languages (sometimes termed Chomsky Type 2) which can be matched by a sequence of replacement rules, each of which essentially maps each non-terminal element to a sequence of terminal elements and/or other nonterminal elements.
Expression templates allow users to approximate the syntax of extended Backus–Naur form (EBNF) completely in C++. Parser objects are composed through operator overloading and the result is a backtracking LL(∞) parser that is capable of parsing rather ambiguous grammars. Spirit can be used for both lexing and parsing, together or separately.
Otherwise choose a column c (deterministically). Choose a row r such that A r, c = 1 (nondeterministically). Include row r in the partial solution. For each column j such that A r, j = 1, for each row i such that A i, j = 1, delete row i from matrix A. delete column j from matrix A. Repeat this algorithm recursively on the reduced matrix A.
A formal grammar that contains left recursion cannot be parsed by a naive recursive descent parser unless they are converted to a weakly equivalent right-recursive form. . However, recent research demonstrates that it is possible to accommodate left-recursive grammars (along with all other forms of general CFGs) in a more sophisticated top-down parser by use of curta
Common examples include algorithms on trees, and recursive descent parsers. As with direct recursion, tail call optimization is necessary if the recursion depth is large or unbounded, such as using mutual recursion for multitasking. Note that tail call optimization in general (when the function called is not the same as the original function ...
Memoization was explored as a parsing strategy in 1991 by Peter Norvig, who demonstrated that an algorithm similar to the use of dynamic programming and state-sets in Earley's algorithm (1970), and tables in the CYK algorithm of Cocke, Younger and Kasami, could be generated by introducing automatic memoization to a simple backtracking recursive ...
For a general method, see removing left recursion. A simple example for left recursion removal: The following production rule has left recursion on E E -> E '+' T E -> T This rule is nothing but list of Ts separated by '+'. In a regular expression form T ('+' T)*. So the rule could be rewritten as E -> T Z Z -> '+' T Z Z -> ε