Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1967] 2 AC 291 is a leading English trusts law case, concerning resulting trusts. It demonstrates that the mere intention to not have a resulting trust (for example, to avoid taxes) does not make it so. This case was the first in a series of decisions involving Tony Vandervell's trusts and his tax ...
Belchier v Parsons; Belmont Finance Corp Ltd v Williams Furniture Ltd (No 2) Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Homan; Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Maxwell (No 2) Blackwell v Blackwell; Boardman v Phipps; Boyce v Boyce; Brinks Ltd v Abu-Saleh (No 3) Brown v Burdett; Brown v Raindle; Burgess v Rawnsley; Butt v Kelson; Buttle v ...
The first was Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners, [1] where the House of Lords was concerned with whether an oral instruction to transfer an equitable interest in shares complied with the writing requirement under Law of Property Act 1925 section 53(1)(c), and so whether receipt of dividends was subject to tax.
When this occurs, the property is held on resulting trust for the settlor, as in Vandervell v IRC. [17] This also occurs where a trust is formed over property which requires formality, but is improperly created (for example, a land transfer that does not adhere to the Law of Property Act 1925). [18]
Re Vandervell Trustees Ltd [1971] AC 912 is a UK tax law case, concerning the ability of the Revenue to amend tax assessments. This case was the second in a series of decisions involving Tony Vandervell 's trusts and his tax liability.
What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code
There are currently about forty-thousand (40,000) living attorneys who comprise the IBP. [6] These are the attorneys whose names appear in the Rolls of Attorneys of the Supreme Court. They have qualified for and have passed the Philippine Bar Examination conducted annually, and have taken the attorney's oath, unless otherwise disbarred.
He is the managing lawyer of Rodriguez & Partners Law Firm which he helped establish in 2003. [5] He is also president of Quezon City Trial Lawyers League, and was treasurer of the UST Law Alumni Foundation (USTLAFI). He was also deputy general counsel of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines. [2]