enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Employment discrimination law in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_discrimination...

    The United States Constitution does not directly address employment discrimination, but its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to protect federal government employees. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution limit the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate ...

  3. McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_burden...

    In United States employment discrimination law, McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting or the McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting framework refers to the procedure for adjudicating a motion for summary judgement under a Title VII disparate treatment claim, in particular a "private, non-class action challenging employment discrimination", [1] that lacks direct evidence of discrimination.

  4. Columbus schools assistant principal sues principal, district ...

    www.aol.com/columbus-schools-assistant-principal...

    A South High School assistant principal sued the principal and Columbus City Schools in federal court. alleging retaliation and racial discrimination. ... of employment than other assistant ...

  5. Muldrow v. City of St. Louis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muldrow_v._City_of_St._Louis

    In employment discrimination cases where the only evidence of discrimination is indirect, courts evaluate the claim under the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework. To have an actionable claim under Title VII, and other employment discrimination statutes, the plaintiff must make out a prima facie (on its face) case of discrimination. This ...

  6. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hosanna-Tabor_Evangelical...

    Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 565 U.S. 171 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that federal discrimination laws do not apply to religious organizations' selection of religious leaders. [1] [2]

  7. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griggs_v._Duke_Power_Co.

    Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), was a court case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on December 14, 1970. It concerned employment discrimination and the disparate impact theory, and was decided on March 8, 1971. [1] It is generally considered the first case of its type. [2]

  8. Disparate impact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact

    Disparate impact in the law of the United States refers to practices in employment, housing, and other areas that adversely affect one group of people of a protected characteristic more than another, even though rules applied by employers or landlords are formally neutral. Although the protected classes vary by statute, most federal civil ...

  9. Employment discrimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_discrimination

    Employment discrimination is a form of illegal discrimination in the workplace based on legally protected characteristics. In the U.S., federal anti-discrimination law prohibits discrimination by employers against employees based on age , race , gender , sex (including pregnancy , sexual orientation , and gender identity ), religion , national ...