Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The leap year problem (also known as the leap year bug or the leap day bug) is a problem for both digital (computer-related) and non-digital documentation and data storage situations which results from errors in the calculation of which years are leap years, or from manipulating dates without regard to the difference between leap years and common years.
On 5 January 1975, the 12-bit field that had been used for dates in the TOPS-10 operating system for DEC PDP-10 computers overflowed, in a bug known as "DATE75". The field value was calculated by taking the number of years since 1964, multiplying by 12, adding the number of months since January, multiplying by 31, and adding the number of days since the start of the month; putting 2 12 − 1 ...
Microsoft Excel has always had a deliberate leap year bug, which falsely treats 29 February 1900 as an actual date, to ensure backward compatibility with Lotus 1-2-3. [20] Hyrum Wright, an engineer at Google, talks about this problem that he observed firsthand while working on C++ core libraries.
The collection features 10 courses, positioned to help first time Java users get their hands around what makes Java special as well as understand its role in modern programming.
This throws it off alignment with the solar year. Meaning if we do not account for the ... (For this reason, the years 1700, 1800, and 1900 were not leap years, but the years 1600 and 2000 were.) ...
The Java language has undergone several changes since JDK 1.0 as well as numerous additions of classes and packages to the standard library.Since J2SE 1.4, the evolution of the Java language has been governed by the Java Community Process (JCP), which uses Java Specification Requests (JSRs) to propose and specify additions and changes to the Java platform.
That resulted in the years 1700, 1800, and 1900 losing their leap day, but 2000 adding one. Every other fourth year in all of these centuries would get it's Feb. 29. And with that the calendrical ...
The DAO bug. On June 17, 2016, the DAO was subjected to an attack exploiting a combination of vulnerabilities, including the one concerning recursive calls, that resulted in the transfer of 3.6 million Ether – around a third of the 11.5 million Ether that had been committed to The DAO – valued at the time at around $50M.