enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hotchpot - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotchpot

    "Every creditor coming in to prove under, and to take the benefit of, the English liquidation, must do so on terms of the English law of bankruptcy: he cannot be permitted to approbate and reprobate, to claim the benefit of that law, and at the same time insist on retaining as against it, any preferential right inconsistent with the equality of ...

  3. Rookes v Barnard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rookes_v_Barnard

    It is a factor also that is taken into account in damages for libel; one man should not be allowed to sell another man's reputation for profit. Where a Defendant with a cynical disregard for a Plaintiff's rights has calculated that the money to be made out of his wrong-doing will probably exceed the damages at risk, it is necessary for the law ...

  4. Reynolds v. Sims - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_v._Sims

    Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population.

  5. Ex turpi causa non oritur actio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_turpi_causa_non_oritur...

    No court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act. If, from the plaintiff's own standing or otherwise, the cause of action appears to arise ex turpi causa ["from an immoral cause"], or the transgression of a positive law of this country, there the court says he has no right to be assisted. It ...

  6. Vexatious litigation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vexatious_litigation

    [43] The moving party, in addition to demonstrating that the plaintiff is vexatious, must show that the case has little chance of prevailing on the merits. If the plaintiff is so determined, a bond may be required, and if the plaintiff does not meet the bond requirement, the case is dismissed.

  7. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palsgraf_v._Long_Island...

    Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928), is a leading case in American tort law on the question of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff.The case was heard by the New York Court of Appeals, the highest state court in New York; its opinion was written by Chief Judge Benjamin Cardozo, a leading figure in the development of American common law and later a United ...

  8. Today’s NYT ‘Strands’ Hints, Spangram and Answers ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/today-nyt-strands-hints-spangram...

    In today's puzzle, there are eight theme words to find (including the spangram). Hint: The first one can be found in the top-half of the board. Here are the first two letters for each word: PH. BO ...

  9. Abstention doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstention_doctrine

    Pullman abstention was the first "doctrine of abstention" to be announced by the Court, and is named for Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496 (1941).The doctrine holds that "the federal courts should not adjudicate the constitutionality of state enactments fairly open to interpretation until the state courts have been afforded a reasonable opportunity to pass on them."