enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Unintentional discharge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintentional_discharge

    An unintentional discharge is the event of a firearm discharging (firing) at a time not intended by the user. An unintended discharge may be produced by an incompatibility between firearm design and usage, such as the phenomenon of cooking off a round in a closed bolt machine gun, a mechanical malfunction as in the case of slamfire in an automatic weapon, or be user induced due to training ...

  3. Firearm malfunction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm_malfunction

    A dud (also a misfire or failure to fire) occurs when the trigger is pulled but the primer or powder in the cartridge malfunctions, causing the firearm not to discharge. Dud rounds can still be dangerous and should be deactivated and disposed of properly. [citation needed]

  4. Katko v. Briney - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katko_v._Briney

    Katko v. Briney, 183 N.W.2d 657 (Iowa 1971), is a court case decided by the Iowa Supreme Court, in which homeowners Edward and Bertha Briney were held liable for battery for injuries caused to trespasser Marvin Katko, who set off a spring gun set as a mantrap in an uninhabited house on their property. [1]

  5. Gun safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_safety

    A yellow flag demonstrates the rifle's bolt is open and the breech is clear. Firearm handling safety poster. Gun safety is the study and practice of managing risk when using, transporting, storing and disposing of firearms, airguns and ammunition in order to avoid injury, illness or death.

  6. Ohio AG sues Norfolk Southern for ‘glaring negligence ...

    www.aol.com/ohio-ag-sues-norfolk-southern...

    Ohio is suing Norfolk Southern in federal court for “recklessly endangering” the health of residents in East Palestine, Ohio, and the surrounding area after a train derailment in the state ...

  7. Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

    Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".

  8. Neighbor's tree fell on my property due to storms. Who is ...

    www.aol.com/neighbors-tree-fell-property-due...

    In the case of trees, that likely means obvious rot or structural deterioration. If an otherwise normal-looking, healthy tree falls onto your property from your neighbor's yard, you likely have no ...

  9. Misfire - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misfire

    "Misfire" (That '70s Show), an episode from That '70s Show; An engine misfire, see engine knocking; A song on Queen's album Sheer Heart Attack; A malfunctioned cartridge that fails to discharge at all , doesn't discharge promptly , or only partially discharges when being shot from a firearm.