enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: should you italicize quotes in chicago style

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles of works - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/...

    These cases are well-established conventions recognized in most style guides. Do not apply italics to other categories or instances because you feel they are creative or artful (e.g., game or sport moves, logical arguments, "artisanal" products, schools of practice or thought, Internet memes, aphorisms, etc.).

  3. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Titles of works/Archive 1

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    I'd appreciate any feedback on this, and possibly a line added to the Manual of Style for future clarification, especially if we decide not to follow Chicago's style. For the record, I do think we should italicize all spacecraft. — Knowledge Seeker দ 23:08, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC) I should think spacecraft would be treated just like (naval) ships.

  4. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Titles of works/Archive 2

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    The Chicago Manual of Style article argues that we should only italicize series titles when they're the official title of a collected work, though, or possibly if they're also the title of an individual work, meaning we should write The Chronicles of Amber and The Lord of the Rings, the Harry Potter series and the Dragaera series.

  5. Wikipedia : Manual of Style/Text formatting

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/...

    Generally, use only one of these styles at a time (do not italicize and quote, or quote and boldface, or italicize and boldface) for words-as-words purposes. Exceptionally, two styles can be combined for distinct purposes, e.g. a film title is italicized and it is also boldfaced in the lead sentence of the article on that film (see WP ...

  6. Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    The Chicago Manual of Style (18th ed.) rightly notes: [m]ost terms listed in Merriam-Webster will not need italics; however, not all words listed there will be familiar to readers, so editorial discretion may be required. [1]

  7. Help:Introduction to the Manual of Style/5 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Introduction_to_the...

    Italicize names of books, films, TV series, music albums, paintings, and ships—but not short works like songs or poems, which should be in quotation marks. Place a full stop (a period) or a comma before a closing quotation mark if it belongs as part of the quoted material ( She said, "I'm feeling carefree . " ); otherwise, put it after ( The ...

  8. Help talk:Citation Style 1/Archive 63 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_talk:Citation_Style_1/...

    Modern Language Association (MLA) italicizes websites in footnotes. However, neither Associated Press (which eschews italics for quote marks) nor the Chicago Manual of Style (as explained here italicizes websites. (There are about 16 or 17 citation styles in more-or-less regular use, incidentally, if we really want to go through them all.)

  9. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Text formatting/Archive 1

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    "De facto" should be in roman, but "de jure" should be in italics. The Chicago Manual of Style, 15th ed., at 7.54 urges that when a familiar foreign word is used in the same context as a similar unfamiliar one, both terms be set in either roman or italics. I suggest that if the third is picked, then MOS should dictate which of the two editors ...

  1. Ad

    related to: should you italicize quotes in chicago style