Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
According to some you might experience jerkyness and stutter because of AMD's separate I/O CCD or because of communication across the compute core CCDs (the 7950x3d has 2). This is something I've seen since long before Intel had E-cores. That being said, I've got two 12900K's and I've yet to experience that problem.
FX-8150 from 2011 vs i7-920 from... 2008. Also Bulldozer barely overclocked while i7 920 went from 2.66 (2.93GHz Turbo) to 4GHz easily. Sandy Bridge went from 3.4GHz to some times 5GHz and SB was still never CPU, also 2011 but Q1. Arrow Lake's slow gaming performance is a big surprise for sure.
The first is the standard Intel i211-AT. This is a ubiquitous adapter that can be found on a variety of motherboards. It is the option for Intel and non-Intel based motherboards alike. It is the gold standard for reliability and compatibility. The second is the Realtek RTL8125-CG 2.5G LAN adapter.
Heh, I remember that craziness. P3 1ghz vs P4 at 1.4ghz. And the 1.7ghz or so chips needed a new mobo months later. That led me to Duron then Athlon XP. Socket 423 was never supposed to be long lived. It was entirely transitional.
Since the 7900X is on-par or negligibly faster than the 7700X in gaming (and so the 9900X might be the same compared to the 9700X), and the 7800X3D is pretty-consistently faster than the 9900X in gaming, and is sometimes a lot faster in gaming, I'm thinking I might get a 7800X3D instead of a 9700X.
Pretty nice achievement, ngl “TechpowerUp’s benchmarks show the GeForce RTX 4080 averaging 25.6 FPS at 4K RT Ultra, roughly 30% slower than the RTX 4090. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a wreck, netting just 6 FPS, followed by the RX 6900 XT with 5.1 FPS. The $999 RDNA 3 flagship is beaten by the...
Sounds like you are closest to being right. Intel pushed these too close to the limit. Instead of +5% headroom, you really have -5% headroom. TH has always been an intel apologist. 100°C is where CPUs are going to crash - that's a chip/cooling problem (from 21 years of overclocking experience and moderating an OC forum).
an xbmc developer recomended intel cpu and nvidia gpu as the most capable. they like atom+nvidia gt520/610 because the other options for small systems are underpowered or underfeatured. I think the same goes for everything up until amd trinity, which I'm not sure about, though I know it is not super appropriate because of the high power ...
The gaming-focused AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is over 40% slower in applications—but much more affordable at the same time. The two-generation old Core i9-12900K trails the 14900K by 26%, sizable but probably not enough to justify an upgrade. Gaming on the Core i9-14900K is extremely impressive, too.
Ryzen 7 5800X3D was also ahead by a few frames in 1% low FPS drops at 96 FPS. Contrastingly, the Ryzen 9 5900X dropped to a lower 1% FPS at 89 FPS. the 5800X3D advantage does erode at 1440p and disappear entirely at 4K where we're GPU-limited. There is a negligible difference moving from the 5900X to the 5800X3D.