enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   The House of Lords allowed the appeal. Lord Steyn gave the leading judgment. Lord Hoffmann agreed with Lord Steyn and said the following. [note 1]Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights.

3. R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Daly)_v_Secretary_of...

   R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26 is a UK constitutional law case of the House of Lords case on the rights of a prisoner when his cell is searched by prison officers.

4. List of judgements of the House of Lords - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_judgements_of_the...

   This page was last edited on 24 October 2024, at 16:25 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

5. R (on the application of Bancoult (No 2)) v Secretary of ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(on_the_application_of...

   R (on the application of Bancoult (No 2)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2016] UKSC 35 [1] was a 2016 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that affirmed the decision of the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte Bancoult (No 2) despite new evidence subsequently coming to light. [2]

6. Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_3_of_the_Human...

   Lord Hoffmann in a case, R (Simms) v Home Secretary, which bridged the introduction of the Human Rights Act, said: [10] Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights. The Human Rights Act 1998 will not detract from this power.

7. List of landmark judgements of the House of Lords - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark...

   UKHL 1 Claims under the 'loss of a chance' doctrine in medical negligence are actionable only where it is more likely than not (>50% likely) that the defendant's negligence caused the plaintiff to lose the chance of recovery. Caparo Industries Plc. v Dickman: 1990 Pure economic loss in tort. Duty of care. Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers ...