enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   The House of Lords allowed the appeal. Lord Steyn gave the leading judgment. Lord Hoffmann agreed with Lord Steyn and said the following. [note 1]Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights.

3. R (Venables and Thompson) v Home Secretary - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Venables_and_Thompson...

   R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables and Thompson [1997] UKHL 25 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning the exercise of independent judgement in judicial review. Facts

4. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   The case was first heard by a Divisional Court, composed of Watkins LJ and Mann J. Mann, with Watkins concurring, rejected the Northumbria Police Authority's argument, saying that under the Royal Prerogative HM Government retained the right to do whatever "was necessary to meet either an actual or an apprehended threat to the peace", something that had not previously been recognised as a ...

5. List of judgements of the House of Lords - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_judgements_of_the...

   Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more

6. A v Secretary of State for the Home Department - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56 (also known as the Belmarsh 9 case) is a UK human rights case heard before the House of Lords.It held that the indefinite detention of foreign prisoners in Belmarsh without trial under section 23 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

7. List of landmark judgements of the House of Lords - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark...

   UKHL 1 Claims under the 'loss of a chance' doctrine in medical negligence are actionable only where it is more likely than not (>50% likely) that the defendant's negligence caused the plaintiff to lose the chance of recovery. Caparo Industries Plc. v Dickman: 1990 Pure economic loss in tort. Duty of care. Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers ...

8. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [1993] UKHL 8, [1994] 1 AC 531 was an important UK constitutional law case concerning applications for judicial review. Facts [ edit ]

9. R (on the application of Bancoult (No 2)) v Secretary of ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(on_the_application_of...

   Judicial review; British Overseas Territories R (on the application of Bancoult (No 2)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2016] UKSC 35 [ 1 ] was a 2016 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that affirmed the decision of the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex ...