Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Goldman Sachs Tower at 30 Hudson Street in Jersey City.. Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, has been the subject of controversies.The company has been criticized for lack of ethical standards, [1] [2] working with dictatorial regimes, [3] close relationships with the U.S. federal government via a "revolving door" of former employees, [4] and driving up prices of commodities through futures ...
(Reuters) -Corporate giants Goldman Sachs and Apple will pay $89 million for violations of consumer protection laws in their joint credit card business that affected hundreds of thousands of ...
Goldman Sachs Personal Financial Management (GSPFM) was a former division of Goldman Sachs responsible for wealth management of high-net-worth individuals. [2] It had 74 offices in the United States and managed $25 billion in assets. [1] [3] In November 2023, it was announced that Creative Planning had completed the acquisition of GSPFM. [4]
While Goldman Sachs’ stock increased 16% this year so far, its Big Four competitors, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Citigroup have increased by 18%, 17%, 14% and 12% ...
Goldman Sachs (GS) is retreating from an ill-fated foray into consumer banking.But there is another area where it plans to expand: private credit. The Wall Street giant is attempting to double the ...
Goldman established investment partnerships that allowed its clients to participate alongside the firm in private equity transactions. On April 23, 2007, Goldman closed GS Capital Partners VI with $20 billion in committed capital, $11 billion from institutional and high-net-worth investors and $9 billion from Goldman Sachs and its employees. [4]
Now CEO David Solomon is leading a sweeping retreat from a variety of consumer offerings while focusing the firm on its core strengths of trading, asset management, and investment banking. Goldman ...
A group of investors sued Goldman Sachs after the financial crisis of 2007–2008 to recover up to $13 billion in losses. In 2020, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit allowed the class action to proceed, by a 2–1 vote. Judge Richard J. Sullivan dissented. [1]