Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Lattice path of length 5 in ℤ 2 with S = { (2,0), (1,1), (0,-1) }.. In combinatorics, a lattice path L in the d-dimensional integer lattice of length k with steps in the set S, is a sequence of vectors ,, …, such that each consecutive difference lies in S. [1]
The acyclicity of G is an essential assumption in the Lindström–Gessel–Viennot lemma; it guarantees (in reasonable situations) that the sums (,) are well-defined, and it advects into the proof (if G is not acyclic, then f might transform a self-intersection of a path into an intersection of two distinct paths, which breaks the argument ...
A totally ordered set is a distributive lattice. 21. A metric lattice is modular. [6] 22. A modular lattice is semi-modular. [7] 23. A projective lattice is modular. [8] 24. A projective lattice is geometric. (def) 25. A geometric lattice is semi-modular. [9] 26. A semi-modular lattice is atomic. [10] [disputed – discuss] 27. An atomic ...
In mathematics, a self-avoiding walk (SAW) is a sequence of moves on a lattice (a lattice path) that does not visit the same point more than once. This is a special case of the graph theoretical notion of a path. A self-avoiding polygon (SAP) is a closed self-avoiding walk on a lattice. Very little is known rigorously about the self-avoiding ...
Similarly, the Schröder numbers count the number of ways to divide a rectangle into + smaller rectangles using cuts through points given inside the rectangle in general position, each cut intersecting one of the points and dividing only a single rectangle in two (i.e., the number of structurally-different guillotine partitions).
This is about lattice theory.For other similarly named results, see Birkhoff's theorem (disambiguation).. In mathematics, Birkhoff's representation theorem for distributive lattices states that the elements of any finite distributive lattice can be represented as finite sets, in such a way that the lattice operations correspond to unions and intersections of sets.
The map φ defined by φ(y) = x ∨ y is a lattice homomorphism from L to the upper closure ↑x = { y ∈ L: x ≤ y}; The binary relation Θ x on L defined by y Θ x z if x ∨ y = x ∨ z is a congruence relation, that is, an equivalence relation compatible with ∧ and ∨. [3] In an arbitrary lattice, if x 1 and x 2 are distributive ...
In the mathematical areas of order and lattice theory, the Knaster–Tarski theorem, named after Bronisław Knaster and Alfred Tarski, states the following: Let (L, ≤) be a complete lattice and let f : L → L be an order-preserving (monotonic) function w.r.t. ≤ . Then the set of fixed points of f in L forms a complete lattice under ≤ .