Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
As the HTTP/1.0 standard did not define any 1xx status codes, servers must not [note 1] send a 1xx response to an HTTP/1.0 compliant client except under experimental conditions. 100 Continue The server has received the request headers and the client should proceed to send the request body (in the case of a request for which a body needs to be ...
Upgrade: h2c, HTTPS/1.3, IRC/6.9, RTA/x11, websocket: Permanent RFC 9110: Via: Informs the server of proxies through which the request was sent. Via: 1.0 fred, 1.1 example.com (Apache/1.1) Permanent RFC 9110: Warning: A general warning about possible problems with the entity body. Warning: 199 Miscellaneous warning: Obsolete [21] RFC 7234, 9111
Yes, people who have received the Strict-Transport-Security header will get a browser error, but I assume all browsers that implement HSTS allow some way for the user to manually override or ignore it (something like "I know what I'm doing", then set a security exception); and the users can be warned in advance on the dedicated page that sets ...
Once the form has (improperly) decided that I'm trying to upload a file with the same name, even if I check the "Ignore any warnings" box, the form fields are all disabled. Then, I click the "Upload file" button, and it does upload, but the body of the page is blank and needs to be created manually.
It seems that if an edit is tagged as "mobile web edit" or "mobile app edit", it is also tagged as "mobile edit" ().Given that the first implies the second, is it possible to only display the more precise tag (mobile web/app edit) and suppress the more general tag?
User:Kingbotk/Plugin – a set of AWB plugins (included with AWB version 4.1.0.0 on onwards) Wikibrowser: part of the Wikipedia:WikiBrowse package; User:Cacycle/wikEd – wikEd, adds enhanced text processing functions to Wikipedia (also available as a gadget, under "Preferences") m:WikiMonitor – fully functional web browser (beta, November 2007)